a raven attacking an eagle The Raven's Blog. May the better bird win.
Google


WWW The Raven's Blog

About the Raven's Blog and About the Blogger

Ravens in the wild sometimes attack eagles, despite the great size difference. Ravens are perhaps the smartest of birds, so it's not out of stupidity. They must have guts to combine with a sense of when to take on a bigger opponent. I admire them for that.

My name is Eric Ferguson. The raven attacking the eagle in the graphic at the upper left comes from the flag I used when I was captain of Clann Tartan, a 17th century Scottish reenactment group. I come from a background that causes me to despise liars and bullies, like what have been running the country since successfully stealing the 2000 election. I'm convinced they're propped up by ignorance, fear, half-truths, and outright whoppers of lies. This blog exists so I can do my bit to bring them down.

At the time this site first went up, which is right now if you're reading this right after I wrote it, which means it's September and I just saved you looking at a calendar (public service performed already) the U.S. is in the heat of the 2004 election. Removing the Supreme Court Appointee from the White House is the top priority, and in no way guaranteed. Therefore I'm helping to expose the deceptions and misinformation that comes from him, his administration, and his supporters. There's quite a lot of course.

Naturally, I hope those reading this blog are persuadable to vote for John Kerry, or at least not vote for Bush. There are plenty of nasty characters elsewhere in politics, so perhaps some of them can be booted from office. At least, even if someone isn't persuaded, at least perhaps they'll be just a bit more skeptical towards the pronouncements of the White House, Congress, and of course the conservative media that supports them with misinformation and disinformation.

Having said that, it might sound odd that I object to the nasty tone of modern politics. On the other hand, I make no bones about it that I blame the right for creating the situation with the venom they spew so freely, and I'm tired of trying to be polite, trying to discuss rather than argue, and seek concensus with people who despise liberalism and think "compromise" and "tolerance" are dirty words. I'm tired of the lies and hypocrisy, and under Bush it's gotten particularly dangerous. I really feel our democracy is in danger for several reasons:

  • The theft of the 2000 election and blatantly partisan act of the Supreme Court to put a Republican in the presidency
  • Attempts made already to steal the 2004 election
  • The spread of touch screen machines which can't be audited or recounted, but are made by Republican activists and have an odd tendency to produce funny results that favor Republicans
  • The failure to act on strong warnings about 911 thereby blowing whatever chance there was of stopping it
  • The stonewalling of the 911 commission, apparently to cover up that failure
  • Violations of civil liberties, such as questioning by law enforcement about political opinions, detention without charge, and holding prisoners incommunicado
  • The looting of the national treasury by friends of the Bush and Cheney
  • Launching a war on phony evidence against a country that posed no threat
  • The exposing of the identity of a CIA agent and deliberately endangering her to punish her husband for exposing some of the lies to justify the war, and then covering up the identity of the leaker
  • Showing blatant disregard for international law, such as by refusing to abide by the Geneva conventions on the treatment of prisoners, launching a war despite international condemnation, and refusing to sign the war crimes treaty
I've left out details since this blog will be full of them, with links to show my sources. I also didn't go much into policy. Notice most of that list involves behavior that is illegal or unethical. It's really the dishonesty and abuse of power that bothers me more than policy. We'll survive bad policy. Honest people can disagree. We won't survive the subverting of democracy.

I thank you for having read this far. I know I didn't say much about myself, but I have a whole personal site full of my writing not only on politics, but history and theater too. I welcome your (polite) comments, and even if you're Bush's staunchest defender, I'll try to reply -- politely.

One addition to the preceeding. There was a mini-controversy since I started this blog over some of the conservative bloggers who have gotten more media attention turning out to be working for the Republican Party and conservative organizations. Apparently they didn't give their names on their blogs, and certainly didn't disclose their connections. Honestly, that might be true of liberal bloggers too. Just so no one can say it's true of me, I here disclose that I do not work for any party, campaign, or political organization. I have given money to Democratic and Green party candidates, to the national and Minnesota Democrats, and to liberal political organizations. I'm a regular donor to Greenpeace and Amnesty International (which would reject the "political" label, and rightly so since they go after human rights violators of all ideologies, but theirs is a cause I strongly believe in as will be evident as you read this blog). I was active in liberal causes back in college, though since then my volunteer time has mostly gone to historical reenacting. Nobody is paying me for this. I speak for no one except myself. Nobody is sending me inside information, talking points, or anything like that.

Eric Ferguson

"To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."
US Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, who successfully prosecuted Nazis at Nuremberg for the crime of aggressive war, thereby establishing the precedent that starting a war is, in and of itself, a war crime.

"A refusal to look back inevitably means moving forward in blindness."
Philip Alston, the U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, on the resistance of the Obama administration to investigating human rights abuses by the Bush administration.

"Why is it that strong women are so often called bullies and ballbreakers, while strong, opinionated men are often called, simply, Justice Scalia."
Salon editor Joan Walsh, on the bigoted attacks on Sonia Sotomayor already on the day of her announcement.

"In Minnesota, Secretary of State Mark Ritchie has made military ballot protection a key priority of his Department. The result is that twice as many military ballots are actually cast, and half as many are rejected, as the national average in 2006."
The National Defense Committee, in an article on their web site praising Minnesota's efforts to encourage absentee voting by military personnel stationed overseas.

"We're seeing massive resistance to the cramdown proposal. That's a proposal to allow bankruptcy judges to reschedule a mortgage on a primary residence. They're fighting this thing tooth and nail. Now the fact is, the people fighting it are the last people who should get the ear of anyone. And it goes to show me they haven't really learned any lessons. A lot of these folks--large banks, Wall Street firms--they have the attitude that "Heads I win, tails you lose." No matter what happens, we always get ours."
Rep. Keith Ellison, on how the bailed out banks are fighting against bankruptcy reform.

''Scores of banks failed in the Great Depression as a result of unsound banking practices, and their failure only deepened the crisis,. Glass-Steagall was intended to protect our financial system by insulating commercial banking from other forms of risk. It was one of several stabilizers designed to keep a similar tragedy from recurring. Now Congress is about to repeal that economic stabilizer without putting any comparable safeguard in its place.''
The late --- and correct --- Paul Wellstone, expressing opposition to repealing the law that prevented financial corporations from entering other types of financial business, like preventing commercial banks from becoming investment banks. This repeal was a large part of making the (collapsing) conglomerates possible.

"The facts revealed reflect the way the U.S. government has consistently tried to cover up the truth of Binyam Mohamed's torture. He was being told he would never leave Guantánamo Bay unless he promised never to discuss his torture, and never sue either the Americans or the British to force disclosure of his mistreatment."
Reprieve Director Clive Stafford Smith, speaking about a British court's ruling that the Bush administration tried to get Mohamed to plead guilty to something, anything, and keep quiet about his treatment as a condition of release.

"We spend hours and hours and hours arguing over $10 million amendments on the floor of the Senate, but there has been no discussion about who has been receiving this $3 trillion."
Sen. Bernie Sanders. I-VT, on the mostly unreported spending by the Federal Reserve to prop up the big financial corporations.

"The AIG scandal is significant and has resonated so powerfully because it is a microscope that enables the public to see what and who has wreaked the destruction that threatens their security and future and, most important of all, to realize that these practices haven't ended and the perpetrators haven't been punished. The opposite is true: those who caused the crisis continue to exert control over what happens and continue to have huge amounts of public money transferred in order to enrich them."
Glenn Greenwald, explaining why the AIG bonus scandal is both symbolic and important.

"Why are we talking about this in the White House? History will not judge this kindly."
Attorney General John Ashcroft, during a principals meeting about torture methods.

"There was no scientific consensus in the 1970s that the Earth was headed into an imminent ice age.

A review of the literature suggests that, to the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking about the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales." Thomas Peterson of the National Climatic Data Center, who surveyed scientific research from 1965-1979 and showed that contrary to what climate change deniers keep asserting, there was no consensus on global cooling. That means the point that climate scientists must be wrong now because they were wrong then is itself based on a false assumption.

"We do not know where George Will is getting his information, but our data shows that on February 15, 1979, global sea ice area was 16.79 million sq. km and on February 15, 2009, global sea ice area was 15.45 million sq. km. Therefore, global sea ice levels are 1.34 million sq. km less in February 2009 than in February 1979. This decrease in sea ice area is roughly equal to the area of Texas, California, and Oklahoma combined.

It is disturbing that the Washington Post would publish such information without first checking the facts."
statement on the web site of University of Illinois' Arctic Climate Research Center, responding to an assertion by global warming denier George Will that they said sea ice area is the same as 1979.

"It has often and confidently been asserted, that man's origin can never be known. But ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science."
Charles Darwin, whose 200th birthday is coming up on February 12.

"The thing I like most is it says you can get these complex traits evolving by a combination of unlikely events. That's just what creationists say can't happen."
evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne, commenting on an experiment that was able to observe a mutation that changed one species into another.



Home       About       Contact       Archives       Quotes       A Strand of the Celtic Fringe       Sparkyferguson.net

This letter has been read by the acting president and approved as within his definition of national security.