a raven attacking an eagle The Raven's Blog. May the better bird win.
Google


WWW The Raven's Blog

Go after Coleman on oil before rent
July 3

I realize the story about Coleman paying what appears to be below-market price rent to a lobbyist, and getting to miss payments with no reminders from his landlord, is an easy story to grab on to. The article didn't get into details about how thoroughly connected the lobbyist in question, Jeff Larson, is to Republican politics including the Coleman campaign. I think his company's work for the junta in Burma is much more disturbing, but that issue seems to have faded with the Burmese cyclone dropping out of the news, so I understand why the rent story is playing so much more.

However, Coleman has recently told two whoppers in his talking points to promote more oil drilling, and it seems there's a commercial in these, not just to make Coleman explain whether he's a liar or too much of a fool to check his talking points, but to shoot down these Republican lies.

The older lie/talking point is the one I highlighted a week ago, "We had the worst natural disaster in the history of this country Katrina, and there wasn't a drop of oil spilled." Read the whole entry for details, but in short, there were enough spills to nearly equal the Exxon Valdez.

The new one is only new for Coleman since it was debunked three weeks ago, even to the point of the acting vice-president admitting it was false. It's hard to hear, but in this video, Coleman can be heard claiming, "The Chinese are able to begin operating 90 miles from our shore by working for Cubans. American companies should tap into those resources.". OK, the 90 miles is new since the other Republicans have been saying 60, but not only is the point not true, it's long been known to not be true, yet Coleman is by TPM's count the eleventh Republican to use it. Most of the public knows little or nothing about this which I assume is why it hasn't been seized on for a commercial (unpaid rent is much easier to understand), but there's a chance to simultaneously get the truth out first and show Coleman getting it wrong.

Drilling Onshore for Information
July 3

Ironically, on the same Sunday Opinion section in which the Star Tribune carried an article on how people incorporate misinformation into what they think they know, the editorial board grossly misinformed their readers on offshore drilling. They repeated the misinformation that drilling is banned when in fact only new leasing is banned. There are tens of millions of acres offshore and in Alaska already leased to oil companies and open to drilling, yet this was not mentioned to readers.

As the board said, there is indeed a debate over how long it would take to get new offshore oil to market. It's a debate is between those telling the truth and special interests deliberately misinforming the public. It is unclear whether it would take 15 years or just a decade for new oil to get to market, but this editorial left readers thinking those who say it would be a few months before gas prices magically come down have a legitimate point. Doesn't anybody fact-check at the Star Tribune anymore?

The Star Tribune would do its readers a much better service to ask why oil companies aren't already drilling where the have leases and know where the oil is. Could it be because oil company stock prices depend partly on how many reserves each company has, so opening up ANWR and more coastline will mean a stock price boost and nice executive bonuses without producing a single drop of oil?

"To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."
US Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, who successfully prosecuted Nazis at Nuremberg for the crime of aggressive war, thereby establishing the precedent that starting a war is, in and of itself, a war crime.

"A refusal to look back inevitably means moving forward in blindness."
Philip Alston, the U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, on the resistance of the Obama administration to investigating human rights abuses by the Bush administration.

"Why is it that strong women are so often called bullies and ballbreakers, while strong, opinionated men are often called, simply, Justice Scalia."
Salon editor Joan Walsh, on the bigoted attacks on Sonia Sotomayor already on the day of her announcement.

"In Minnesota, Secretary of State Mark Ritchie has made military ballot protection a key priority of his Department. The result is that twice as many military ballots are actually cast, and half as many are rejected, as the national average in 2006."
The National Defense Committee, in an article on their web site praising Minnesota's efforts to encourage absentee voting by military personnel stationed overseas.

"We're seeing massive resistance to the cramdown proposal. That's a proposal to allow bankruptcy judges to reschedule a mortgage on a primary residence. They're fighting this thing tooth and nail. Now the fact is, the people fighting it are the last people who should get the ear of anyone. And it goes to show me they haven't really learned any lessons. A lot of these folks--large banks, Wall Street firms--they have the attitude that "Heads I win, tails you lose." No matter what happens, we always get ours."
Rep. Keith Ellison, on how the bailed out banks are fighting against bankruptcy reform.

''Scores of banks failed in the Great Depression as a result of unsound banking practices, and their failure only deepened the crisis,. Glass-Steagall was intended to protect our financial system by insulating commercial banking from other forms of risk. It was one of several stabilizers designed to keep a similar tragedy from recurring. Now Congress is about to repeal that economic stabilizer without putting any comparable safeguard in its place.''
The late --- and correct --- Paul Wellstone, expressing opposition to repealing the law that prevented financial corporations from entering other types of financial business, like preventing commercial banks from becoming investment banks. This repeal was a large part of making the (collapsing) conglomerates possible.

"The facts revealed reflect the way the U.S. government has consistently tried to cover up the truth of Binyam Mohamed's torture. He was being told he would never leave Guantánamo Bay unless he promised never to discuss his torture, and never sue either the Americans or the British to force disclosure of his mistreatment."
Reprieve Director Clive Stafford Smith, speaking about a British court's ruling that the Bush administration tried to get Mohamed to plead guilty to something, anything, and keep quiet about his treatment as a condition of release.

"We spend hours and hours and hours arguing over $10 million amendments on the floor of the Senate, but there has been no discussion about who has been receiving this $3 trillion."
Sen. Bernie Sanders. I-VT, on the mostly unreported spending by the Federal Reserve to prop up the big financial corporations.

"The AIG scandal is significant and has resonated so powerfully because it is a microscope that enables the public to see what and who has wreaked the destruction that threatens their security and future and, most important of all, to realize that these practices haven't ended and the perpetrators haven't been punished. The opposite is true: those who caused the crisis continue to exert control over what happens and continue to have huge amounts of public money transferred in order to enrich them."
Glenn Greenwald, explaining why the AIG bonus scandal is both symbolic and important.

"Why are we talking about this in the White House? History will not judge this kindly."
Attorney General John Ashcroft, during a principals meeting about torture methods.

"There was no scientific consensus in the 1970s that the Earth was headed into an imminent ice age.

A review of the literature suggests that, to the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking about the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales." Thomas Peterson of the National Climatic Data Center, who surveyed scientific research from 1965-1979 and showed that contrary to what climate change deniers keep asserting, there was no consensus on global cooling. That means the point that climate scientists must be wrong now because they were wrong then is itself based on a false assumption.

"We do not know where George Will is getting his information, but our data shows that on February 15, 1979, global sea ice area was 16.79 million sq. km and on February 15, 2009, global sea ice area was 15.45 million sq. km. Therefore, global sea ice levels are 1.34 million sq. km less in February 2009 than in February 1979. This decrease in sea ice area is roughly equal to the area of Texas, California, and Oklahoma combined.

It is disturbing that the Washington Post would publish such information without first checking the facts."
statement on the web site of University of Illinois' Arctic Climate Research Center, responding to an assertion by global warming denier George Will that they said sea ice area is the same as 1979.

"It has often and confidently been asserted, that man's origin can never be known. But ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science."
Charles Darwin, whose 200th birthday is coming up on February 12.

"The thing I like most is it says you can get these complex traits evolving by a combination of unlikely events. That's just what creationists say can't happen."
evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne, commenting on an experiment that was able to observe a mutation that changed one species into another.



Home       About       Contact       Archives       Quotes       A Strand of the Celtic Fringe       Sparkyferguson.net

This letter has been read by the acting president and approved as within his definition of national security.