a raven attacking an eagle The Raven's Blog. May the better bird win.
Google


WWW The Raven's Blog

What actually happened at the convention
June 11

That's a bit of a provocative heading (at least I hope so --- you're still reading, right), but basically, I have my own take on why Al Franken won the DFL (Minnesota Democrats) endorsement on the first ballot.

First, for those of you not familiar with how the DFL endorses (it's different in each state), a candidate has to get a supermajority of 60% of voting delegates to become the officially endorsed candidate. That means those candidates get some party help in the primary, like being able to use the party logo and appear at party-organized events. Anybody can run in the primary, but the party endorsement has been a strong predictor of the primary result so far this decade.

I was at the state convention last weekend as a non-voting delegate, so I observed Franken's first ballot win, which was generally considered a surprise, not that he won but that it took only one ballot. My impression, based on conversations, press reports, and of course my own thought process and understanding of Minnesota politics, was that Franken's support going in was broad and shaky. His rival for the endorsement, Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, is largely unknown outside DFL activists and maybe even outside the Twin Cities, but he showed himself to be a strong candidate. He's a stronger public speaker than Franken, has staunchly liberal positions including unwavering support for single-payer, and has been able to recruit many loyal and active volunteers. He also hasn't had any bad press, which of course is why Franken's support was shaky. Nelson-Pallmeyer's one weakness was that he hasn't been the target of opposition research (so far as I know --- conceivably as Franken got in trouble, the GOP started investigating him).

My take was that unless Nelson-Pallmeyer thoroughly bombed in the speech and Q&A, his performance didn't really matter. It mattered whether Franken was the seemingly demoralized and worn out candidate who appeared at the congressional district conventions, or the one who picked up such a large following through the first year of the campaign. The last couple months before the convention had been full of bad news for Franken for reason I'm sure I don't need to go into for anyone who has followed the race at all, and there was concern that he had done a poor job of responding. He had responded well to the attacks by the GOP for the first year after he declared, but now he was a GOP punching bag, and confidence had ebbed right at a crucial time. So the endorsement quite possibly hinged on which version of Franken showed up.

The short of it is Franken appeared to have his mojo back. Maybe deciding how to address the Playboy controversy, and giving the full apology rather than spinning or giving one of those "if someone was offended" half-apologies, got the monkey off his back. Whatever, he held his own at the podium. Nelson-Pallmeyer didn't go after him on the Playboy story or other controversial statements, but did point up that he had made the race competitive on a fraction of the funding. Franken handled that well, pointing out that he hadn't spent all the money he raised, but had relied on appearing at every DFL event and meeting voters all over the state in his own grassroots campaign. He has 100,000 individual contributors and doesn't rely on lobbyists for corporate special interests, unlike Coleman. Many of his lines sounded familiar to those who have heard him during the campaign or his radio show, like his statement that the only special interest money he can be accused of taking is "big comedy", and Harold Ramis or Tom Hanks won't be asking for special regulations and earmarks, unlike big coal, big tobacco, etc.

The main question of course was whether he would handle the Playboy controversy, and I thought he did, as apparently did the majority of delegates. Nonetheless many delegates were torn, as I would have been had I had a vote, because Nelson-Pallmeyer showed himself a reasonable claimant to the mantle of Paul Wellstone, being a professor at a small college with a history of activism, and running a grassroots campaign on little money. He earned another shot as a candidate. In fact, He was very similar to Wellstone except for the bad luck of running in a year when another strong candidate wanted the nomination and could run a grassroots campaign, whereas Wellstone ran when better known potential candidates opted against taking on a seemingly unbeatable GOP incumbent. He also gained respect for the graceful way he conceded, taking the podium to move that Franken be elected by acclimation before the results of the first ballot were known. In fact, the results weren't announced, and I knew only because I was sitting next to a delegate who was told by a teller she knew.

In a story that can be my personal brush with celebrity, I saw Franken at the unity party that evening, which was actually the first I've had to speak to him. I told him it was a shame either of them had to lose, which he agreed with having come to respect his opponent, and he mentioned he didn't know why Nelson-Pallmeyer suddenly conceded. I told him I heard he got 62%. Only later did it occur to me that it was slightly absurd that he found this out not through an official channel, but from me, some guy who happened to overhear someone else getting an inside scoop. I didn't really think about it until I mentioned this to another delegate in another conversation, and he found it hilarious. In some ways, it's still Will Rogers' party.

Anyway, though this was the first state convention I attended not counting listening on radio, my impression is that the party got past the divisiveness of both the senate and presidential races. Not 100%, judging by the Nelson-Pallmeyer supporter who called in to Franken on Midday on Monday, but more-so than normal.

Forgive the lack of links to video of the convention speeches, but I'm surprised at not finding any anywhere. If someone knows where video is to be found, please tell me. I mentioned both senate candidates being impressive, but Sen Amy Klobuchar gave a particularly well-received speech too. We also heard from Howard Dean, Mark Ritchie, Tim Walz, James Oberstar, and Steve Sarvi.

"Those 12,000 actually are my big interest in the next legislative session, because I think those 12,000 valid Minnesota voters face a system too complicated that disenfranchised them."
MN Sec. of State Mark Ritchie, speaking about 12,000 absentee ballots that were rejected, mostly due to voter error with complex rules, or delays in overseas mail, and of course 1352 mistakenly rejected by election workers.

"There's kind of a weird double-think involved in arguments that the slump should be allowed to follow its natural course. It's true that classical economics says that we should let market forces do their work; but classical economics also says that severe recessions can't happen. This idea that we must not intervene is based on a worldview that is refuted by the very fact that the economy is in the mess it's in."
Economist Paul Krugman, defending the idea that the government should use fiscal policy to stimulate the economy instead of letting a recession run its course.

"This is a precursor to card check and other items. Republicans should stand firm and take their first shot against organized labor, instead of taking their first blow from it."
Internal Senate Republican caucus memo, revealing that the reason for opposing the auto bailout isn't about economics, but about attacking organized labor, and the consequences be damned.

"You got bailed out, we got sold out."
United Electrical Workers Local 1110, who are occupying the factory of Republic Windows and Doors, from which they were laid off without legally required notice, and or being denied payments due them by Republic's creditor, Bank of America, which received $25 billion in bailout funds.

"On NBC and in other public forums, General McCaffrey has consistently advocated wartime policies and spending priorities that are in line with his corporate interests. But those interests are not described to NBC's viewers. He is held out as a dispassionate expert, not someone who helps companies win contracts related to the wars he discusses on television."
NY Times reporter David Barstow, on how one of the most frequently seen military experts in the media has conflicts of interest not shared with viewers, like most former generals working as military experts on TV.

"Dear advocates of violent retaliation against any and all Muslims: Congratulations. You're doing exactly what the terrorists want you to do."
Salon letter writer "Phoenix Woman", responding to other letter writers calling for retaliation against Muslims for the Mumbai attacks, including extensive use of torture.

"It appears that we've crossed a threshold where the ocean can no longer buffer the effects of CO2 in the atmosphere."
Timothy Wootton, lead author of a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, regarding the unexpectedly fast acidification of the oceans.

"Given the 'shoot first, ask questions never ethos,' I expect their vetting will be less than thorough and 'better' only from a partisan perspective."
Journalist David Brauer, who actually investigated Mountain Iron tally story, responding to a commenter who suggested Powerline as a better place to get information on election procedures..

"Since the 'Star Trek' teleporter has not yet been invented, these ballots are driven to the polling places."
Journalist David Brauer, who actually investigated the ballots in the car story, explaining that election workers use their cars to carry absentee ballots to the voter's precinct on election day.

"Since these changes are part of the canvassing process, since it says unofficial counts, since every recount always occurs likes this, we assume that campaign professionals know this. And the decision to use words designed to create a cloud over the election is a political strategy. It's a well-known political strategy. It's unfortunate."
MN Sec. of State Mark Ritchie, calling out Norm Coleman on his attempt to claim fraud because the vote count changes slightly during the final stages of the first count, which it does in all elections. Which even us non-professionals knew and I'm sure the state Republicans knew it too.

"I would step back. I just think the need for a healing process is so important [and] the possibility that any change magnitude is so remote."
Norm Coleman, asking Franken to accept Coleman's dinky lead, speaking words that will be brought back up to him if he falls behind.

"It means that James Cheney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman did not die in vain."
Matthew Duss, research associate, Center for American Progress Action Fund, answering the question, what does Obama's victory mean? Those names are the civil rights workers murdered near Philadelphia, MS, in 1964.

"If the Marines, some of the most conservative members of our society, can look beyond sexual preference, maybe the rest of America can do so too. If someone is willing to wear the uniform, fight, and possibly die for this country, it shouldn't matter who they are and who they love."
DFL 3rd congressional district candidate Ashwin Madia, explaining how his experience in the Marines changed his opinion on gay rights.

"Obama's going to win, and I didn't want to tell my grandchildren some day that I had an opportunity to vote for the first black president, but I missed my chance at history and voted for the other guy."
A voter in Cincinnati named Mike, who change his mind after talking with some elderly Jewish ladies who had been active in the civil rights movement in the 60's while waiting to vote.



Home       About       Contact       Archives       Quotes       A Strand of the Celtic Fringe       Sparkyferguson.net

This letter has been read by the acting president and approved as within his definition of national security.