a raven attacking an eagle The Raven's Blog. May the better bird win.
Google


WWW The Raven's Blog

May 27
History shows that massacres like Haditha happen in every war. You're possibly thinking that's a trite statement to excuse it. Actually, I believe it makes it worse. Anybody who starts a war knows helpless people will be murdered, but they start them anyway. If you think this is leading to another attack on the chickenhawks who started the war, you're right, and if you're thinking this is piling on, tough. They people who made the war are as responsible as the marines who fired the shots, because they created the situation that made Haditha inevitable.


In case my mentions the last couple days of the relationship between Ken Lay and George Bush was new, I direct you to Democracy Now, which went in depth in the relationship in a recent program.

May 26
Remember when a better George refused to become king? This will remind you (the video is about one minute).


I wish it weren't so late last night or I'd have taken time to show how these scandals are connected, why it's a culture of corruption and not a few isolated incidents. Yesterday, Lay and Skilling were convicted for accounting fraud, meaning they lied about the money coming in and going out so investors would be deceived about Enron's real condition. The acting president waited too long to implement his new rule. BusinessWeek found buried in the Federal Register a little line where Bush gave Negroponte the authority to let corporations doing classified business with the government hide financial results. The article says it's based on changes to the securities laws of 1934, and it's authority every president has had since Carter. They know of no instances where this authority was either delegated or used. Think about this. If it's legal, why was it done so quietly? Why didn't Bush say he just made the schemes Enron pulled legal? We've seen a pattern where Bush gets caught doing something illegal --- torture, surveillance, detention without charge or trial --- and then claims it was perfectly legal. Apparently not legal enough to admit to before getting caught. So here they go again. My guess is that when we know more about the law under which Bush claims this authority, it will turn out he's breaking it. Thus are the corporate scandals now connected to abuse of power scandals.

May 25
What's the right word here? Hmmm. How about "Yow!" Or "Whoopee!" Just pick one, because the good guys won one today. The acting president's moneybag and culture of corruption posterboy, Ken Lay, was convicted on all six counts by the jury, and the judge found him guilty in a trial on separate charges. Jeffrey Skilling was convicted on 19 of 28 charges. Both could be in jail for decades. Like some people interviewed by the Houston Chronicle, though it was obvious they were two of the biggest crooks in the history of corporations, I feared the rich and powerful would again would escape justice. Though I haven't trusted Bush's Attorneys General (yes, I have the plural in the right place --- "general" means in general, not a rank) there are employees at the Justice Department doing their best, and I have to respect the prosecutors who went after someone so close to the acting president as the executives of Enron.

Though it won't break my heart if they spend life in prison, from a purely strategic point of view I hope their sentences are short enough to give them hope of getting out of jail. That's because I suspect they know plenty more. Lay especially was close to Bush. The better read among you may recall the charge that Lay was allowed to interview candidates for the FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission). I don't know if those charges were ever confirmed, but I'd sure like to see Lay asked under oath about that. Enron was behind the electrical fraud in California (at least we've heard precious little about electricity deregulation since then). Sure would be nice to see charges from that. Was there any understanding when Alberto Gonzales worked for Enron before getting a seat on the Texas Supreme Court and then ruled in cases involving his former employer? Basically, these guys must know where a bunch of the bodies are buried, and if they have realistic hope of getting out of jail for cooperating, maybe they'll spill. Or maybe they'll feel the pangs of conscience for all the people they've robbed and.... sorry, had a moment of silliness there. I just hope they get and take an offer of a short sentence in exchange for telling all they know about California, Gonzales, and of course Bush.

May 22
The Dead Polar Bear Award goes to the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), or at least to anyone who believes their new commercials defending the victim of an environmentalist smear campaign, carbon dioxide. No, I'm not kidding. That's why I provided the link. If you believe this astroturf group (fake grassroots), global warming isn't real, but just an attempt to denigrate the reputation of that victim of a molecule. Carbon dioxide is our friend. Regardless of the quantity. So I guess go breathe deep of pure carbon CO2. What, that wouldn't be healthy? You mean you can have too much of a good thing? Yes, in excess man-made quantities, even a naturally occurring substance can be a pollutant. There might be a more scientific way to put that but common sense should suffice to make the point. For everyone who prefers to ignore almost every scientist on the planet because someone runs a commercial saying CO2 is life, here's your Dead Polar Bear Award. Put it on a high enough shelf that the water of melting ice caps can't reach it.

"To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."
US Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, who successfully prosecuted Nazis at Nuremberg for the crime of aggressive war, thereby establishing the precedent that starting a war is, in and of itself, a war crime.

"A refusal to look back inevitably means moving forward in blindness."
Philip Alston, the U.N. special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, on the resistance of the Obama administration to investigating human rights abuses by the Bush administration.

"Why is it that strong women are so often called bullies and ballbreakers, while strong, opinionated men are often called, simply, Justice Scalia."
Salon editor Joan Walsh, on the bigoted attacks on Sonia Sotomayor already on the day of her announcement.

"In Minnesota, Secretary of State Mark Ritchie has made military ballot protection a key priority of his Department. The result is that twice as many military ballots are actually cast, and half as many are rejected, as the national average in 2006."
The National Defense Committee, in an article on their web site praising Minnesota's efforts to encourage absentee voting by military personnel stationed overseas.

"We're seeing massive resistance to the cramdown proposal. That's a proposal to allow bankruptcy judges to reschedule a mortgage on a primary residence. They're fighting this thing tooth and nail. Now the fact is, the people fighting it are the last people who should get the ear of anyone. And it goes to show me they haven't really learned any lessons. A lot of these folks--large banks, Wall Street firms--they have the attitude that "Heads I win, tails you lose." No matter what happens, we always get ours."
Rep. Keith Ellison, on how the bailed out banks are fighting against bankruptcy reform.

''Scores of banks failed in the Great Depression as a result of unsound banking practices, and their failure only deepened the crisis,. Glass-Steagall was intended to protect our financial system by insulating commercial banking from other forms of risk. It was one of several stabilizers designed to keep a similar tragedy from recurring. Now Congress is about to repeal that economic stabilizer without putting any comparable safeguard in its place.''
The late --- and correct --- Paul Wellstone, expressing opposition to repealing the law that prevented financial corporations from entering other types of financial business, like preventing commercial banks from becoming investment banks. This repeal was a large part of making the (collapsing) conglomerates possible.

"The facts revealed reflect the way the U.S. government has consistently tried to cover up the truth of Binyam Mohamed's torture. He was being told he would never leave Guantánamo Bay unless he promised never to discuss his torture, and never sue either the Americans or the British to force disclosure of his mistreatment."
Reprieve Director Clive Stafford Smith, speaking about a British court's ruling that the Bush administration tried to get Mohamed to plead guilty to something, anything, and keep quiet about his treatment as a condition of release.

"We spend hours and hours and hours arguing over $10 million amendments on the floor of the Senate, but there has been no discussion about who has been receiving this $3 trillion."
Sen. Bernie Sanders. I-VT, on the mostly unreported spending by the Federal Reserve to prop up the big financial corporations.

"The AIG scandal is significant and has resonated so powerfully because it is a microscope that enables the public to see what and who has wreaked the destruction that threatens their security and future and, most important of all, to realize that these practices haven't ended and the perpetrators haven't been punished. The opposite is true: those who caused the crisis continue to exert control over what happens and continue to have huge amounts of public money transferred in order to enrich them."
Glenn Greenwald, explaining why the AIG bonus scandal is both symbolic and important.

"Why are we talking about this in the White House? History will not judge this kindly."
Attorney General John Ashcroft, during a principals meeting about torture methods.

"There was no scientific consensus in the 1970s that the Earth was headed into an imminent ice age.

A review of the literature suggests that, to the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking about the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales." Thomas Peterson of the National Climatic Data Center, who surveyed scientific research from 1965-1979 and showed that contrary to what climate change deniers keep asserting, there was no consensus on global cooling. That means the point that climate scientists must be wrong now because they were wrong then is itself based on a false assumption.

"We do not know where George Will is getting his information, but our data shows that on February 15, 1979, global sea ice area was 16.79 million sq. km and on February 15, 2009, global sea ice area was 15.45 million sq. km. Therefore, global sea ice levels are 1.34 million sq. km less in February 2009 than in February 1979. This decrease in sea ice area is roughly equal to the area of Texas, California, and Oklahoma combined.

It is disturbing that the Washington Post would publish such information without first checking the facts."
statement on the web site of University of Illinois' Arctic Climate Research Center, responding to an assertion by global warming denier George Will that they said sea ice area is the same as 1979.

"It has often and confidently been asserted, that man's origin can never be known. But ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science."
Charles Darwin, whose 200th birthday is coming up on February 12.

"The thing I like most is it says you can get these complex traits evolving by a combination of unlikely events. That's just what creationists say can't happen."
evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne, commenting on an experiment that was able to observe a mutation that changed one species into another.



Home       About       Contact       Archives       Quotes       A Strand of the Celtic Fringe       Sparkyferguson.net

This letter has been read by the acting president and approved as within his definition of national security.