a raven attacking an eagle The Raven's Blog. May the better bird win.
Google


WWW The Raven's Blog

November 7
It's been five days since I wondered where this would go with challenging judges on political grounds in the DeLay trial. I spent the weekend in DeLay's district as well as being a tourist around other parts of the Houston area, but I can't tell this is foremost on anyone's minds. At the local daily, the Houston Chronicle, one columnist, Clay Robinson, made mention that the partisanship of judges might be a problem. I like some things about Texas. That's not one of them. Being able to be part of the small but intense crowd at the Houston Aeros game (American Hockey League, the top minor league) was one of the things I've liked. Walking out of a hockey arena and seeing palm trees was just weird. The main thing though is I was accurate in my sort of prediction, "sort of" because I suppose I was suggesting this could happen rather than saying it would.

However, there is something else where I feel justified in saying "I told you so", in this case on my personal site before I started this blog. Over in the quotes column today I added this from a Houston Chronicle editorial today: "It should give Americans of both parties pause when the assessment of ordinary citizens opposing the war, and that of the U.N. officials looking for weapons in Iraq, proves more reliable than the combined intelligence capability of the free world." I was one of those opponents before the invasion. As best I recall, about 30% of the public never bought Bush's sales pitch, and I feel confident in saying the majority opposed the war at least in part because they didn't think the evidence held up. There's a bigger point besides boasting about having been right. What will the effect be of intelligence agencies being so wrong or so misused, whichever you believe? What will the effect be of the government being so wrong or deceptive, again depending on which you believe, and war opponents being so much more accurate then the intelligence agencies, the government, and for that matter the mainstream and conservative media? I suggest all future administrations will have a tougher time selling the public on war, which generally is a good thing, but it isn't a positive for the public to start from the assumption the government is either wrong or lying. It may get harder to sell not just war, but also good things like, for example, energy efficiency or or anti-poverty initiatives.

Supporters of good ideas as well as bad ideas have to get past the point that it doesn't matter if government and media are in agreement when they have a record of being so wrong. Let us hope that once the country can get past the partisan bitterness and some basic level of trust, we'll realize that the credibility problem of the acting president is a function of having such a person as president and having such people surrounding him, and not something inherent to just anyone who might someday work in the White House. Unfortunately, I expect the next president will spend the whole first term just cleaning up Bush's mess, and even the second term and maybe the next president will have to focus on rebuilding American credibility both at home and abroad --- and that's assuming they succeed in rebuilding it. Otherwise, we will be talking about the spectre of Iraq they way we did about Vietnam into the 90's, not to mention the revival of Vietnam's divisiveness in the last election.

November 2
I'm driving down to Texas as I write this, on the same day I read in the print edition of the Kansas City Star that Tom DeLay was successful in getting another judge because the first judge had given money to Democrats. To a degree I don't blame him (though it sounded from the article like he was his usual arrogant smirking self), but I also know he's trying to get a judge who is dependent on Republican campaign cash. It struck me because Minnesota's law preventing judges from running as partisans, collecting large campaign donations, and addressing specific issues, was recently thrown out by the US Supreme Court (but conservatives don't believe in judicial activism, remember that when they, um, judicially activate).

Besides the change in Tom DeLay's judge, I thought of the recent revelation of one of Harriet Miers' scandals, where a judge she gave money to put her crony on a commission that bought her land for ten times market value. I also was reminded of the debate over the nomination of Priscilla Owen, who took a wad of campaign cash from Enron when she ran for the Texas Supreme Court and then ruled in Enron's cases in Enron's favor. I really don't want that in Minnesota, and I start to question the whole idea of electing judges. If Tom DeLay can't get a fair trial from a Democratic judge, can the prosecution get a fair trial from a Republican judge? Isn't it obvious having judges identified by party is just going to undercut the judicial system? One of the smart things Minnesota did was set up a commission for judicial appointments. Think about if federal judges were chosen that way. The fighting over nominations is consistently over nominees with some combination of extreme views, low qualifications, and ethical problems. The result is a judiciary that feels more political pressure than ever, and no originalist can tell me the founding fathers intended the courts to be a branch of one political party.

"You don't care about me."
16 year old Guantanamo detainee Omar Khadr, when he realized the Canadian agent he thought had come to take him out of Hell and home to Canada was just another interrogator.

"Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation whenever he shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him to do so whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such purpose, and you allow him to make war at his pleasure. Study to see if you can fix any limit to his power in this respect, after having given him so much as you propose."
Abraham Lincoln in 1848, during the Mexican War, expressing why allowing a president sole discretion to decide when to invade another country is dangerous to the liberty of his own country.

"The OPR [the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility]also has been far behind in producing required annual public reports summarizing its activities. Last month, it released its report covering fiscal year 2005. That means many investigations undertaken during the tenure of former Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales remain under wraps."
LA Times reporter Richard B. Schmit, in an article written in July 2008, on how the OPR is hiding the results of investigations --- assuming they actually are investigating.

"Mr. Chairman, I think the number's actually higher than that now. Last time I checked it was 108, and the total number that were declared homicides by the military services, or by the CIA, or others doing investigations, CID, and so forth — was 25, 26, 27."
Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell's former chief of staff, on the number of detainees killed in Bush's prisons in Iraq, Afghanistan, and locations still secret.

"Democracy works, but sometimes churns slowly. Time is short. The 2008 election is critical for the planet. If Americans turn out to pasture the most brontosaurian congressmen, if Washington adapts to address climate change, our children and grandchildren can still hold great expectations."
James Hansen, on the 20th anniversary of his testimony before Congress where he informed them global warming was now certain, and how little time remains to prevent catastrophes.

"Who will chair the commission investigating the secrets of warrantless spying, years from today? Will it be a young senator in this body today? Will it be someone not yet elected? What will that senator say when he or she comes to our actions, reads in the records how we let outrage after outrage after outrage slide, with nothing more than a promise to stop the next one? I imagine that senator will ask of us, 'Why didn't they do anything? Why didn't they fight back? In June 2008, when no one could doubt anymore what the administration was doing---why did they sit on their hands?'"
Sen. Chris Dodd, in his speech on the Senate floor opposing the FISA bill and retroactive immunity.

"We had the worst natural disaster in the history of this country Katrina, and there wasn't a drop of oil spilled."
Sen. Norm Coleman, proposing more offshore oil drilling. There was actually enough oil spilled to match the Exxon Valdez. Whether Coleman is lying, or ignorantly repeating Republican talking points, is unknown.

"I'll go back to square one on this: We squandered a lot of gifts. Human beings were given a lot of great gifts. We were given the ability to reason, this extra-large brain, walking erect, having binocular vision and the opposable thumb, and all of these things, and we had such promise, but we squandered it on goods and superstition. We gave ourselves over to the high priests and the traders, and they are the ones we allow to control us."
George Carlin, in an interview with Salon, on how he became a disappointed idealist.

"To date, seven long years after we scooped up our first detainees in Afghanistan, not a single one of them has faced evidence, his accusers, or anything remotely resembling a legal court hearing on his guilt or innocence."
Joseph Galloway, military correspondent for McClatchy, on how responsibility for war crimes goes right to the top, despite efforts to confine consequences to the bottom, in light of the recent McClatchy series on detainees.

"As I was leaving the UN food distribution center in Damascus, Layla Atiya, the widow with seven children, touched my arm. 'Can you tell me one thing?,' she pleaded. 'Why did America do this to us? What did we do to America to make her hate us so?'"
Medea Benjamin, cofounder of Code Pink, writing about her visit to Iraqi refugee camps.

"So we're sitting here and, for example, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, who said that he wanted to be a martyr on 9/11, make no mistake about it --- he said that he just couldn't get a visa --- launched into a description of what kind of psychotropic drugs he's taking here at the prison camp, or being given here at the prison camp. And the media monitors hit the white noise button. We didn't get to hear what exactly he's being given and we didn't exactly hear his explanation about why he's on medication.

And one of the escorts here explained that this was HIPAA protection, the Health and Information Protection Act on a place where the Bush Administration says the Constitution doesn't apply."
Miami Herald reporter Carol Rosenberg, on the restrictions placed on the press and mistreatment of detainees.

"If the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court was really concerned about fairness, it could have simply asked the Florida Supreme Court to devise a universal standard, appoint a judge to enforce it, and then extend the state's meaningless 'safe harbor' deadline to make it possible to complete the recount. It did not do so because it was not interested in counting the votes. It wanted George W. Bush to win."
Gary Kamiya, Salon writer at large, in a review of the HBO's "Recount", on how the Supreme Court stole the election for Bush.

"Convicting and imprisoning Paul Minor on corruption charges could be a powerful way to curtail contributions to the local Democratic Party."
U.S. House Judiciary Committee report on political prosecutions by the Bush DOJ. Minor was a vital contributor to the Mississippi Democratic Party.

"Where does the madness end? Where do words lose their meaning? Al-Qa'ida is not being defeated. Hizbollah has just won a domestic war in Lebanon, as total as Hamas's war in Gaza. Afghanistan and Iraq and Lebanon and Gaza are hell disasters — I need no apology to quote Churchill's description of 1948 Palestine yet again — and this foolish, stupid, vicious man is lying to the world yet again."
Robert Fisk, columnist and resident of Lebanon, responding to remarks by Bush that show he hasn't the least understanding of the region he's mucking up.

"The short version: Republicans in Congress, McCain included, have slashed the United States budget for wind energy since Carter was president, which is why McCain has to speak at a Danish turbine manufacturer instead of an American one."
Mother Jones reporter/blogger Jonathan Stein, noting that McCain made his climate change speech in a Danish wind turbine factory after repeatedly cutting funding for wind development here.

"We get off on warfare."
Rev. Rod Parsley, McCain's spiritual advisor, who calls for mass murder, in a snippet of a sermon in a video by Mother Jones and Brave New Films. That line of Christian charity comes about 1:25 into the video.



Home       About       Contact       Archives       Quotes       A Strand of the Celtic Fringe       Sparkyferguson.net

This letter has been read by the acting president and approved as within his definition of national security.