ACORN does good work and is run by idiots
October 14
In case the heading isn't clear enough, I'm angry with ACORN. Spitting angry. Yes, I recognize the accomplishment and value of registering 1.3 million voters. I realize the fraudulent registrations will be just a few thousand at most, and scattered across the country. I recognize that ACORN itself caught almost all those registrations and was the one that alerted the authorities to likely fraud. I also recognize that Bugs Bunny probably won't show up at the polls, that the Dallas Cowboys didn't actually register in Nevada and won't be voting there, and the people who filled in 20 cards to help someone make a quota or earn a bonus still get to vote only once. Just in case someone thinks I'm actually buying the latest conservative nonsense, I do actually get all that.
Nonetheless, I call the people in charge of ACORN idiots because they should have known exactly what gift of controversy they were giving conservatives. They got plenty of blowback in 2004 for these exact same problems, the inevitable fraud that occurs when people are paid for registrations. So fine, they stopped paying by the registration, but requiring employees to meet a quota or get a certain number to qualify for a bonus is the same incentive. ABove all, they knew, or have to be insanely stupid if they didn't know, that conservatives were gunning for them. It almost doesn't matter that they were the victims of fraud instead of the ones who engaged in it, and that the organization itself is legally in the clear. No one will remember that. Most people will remember something about voter fraud, and that's it. Conservatives have the tools handed to them to undermine Obama's legitimacy if he wins, just as much as the acting president was undermined by 30,000 Black voters in Florida being wrongly identified as felons to stop them from voting in 2000. It shouldn't be the case, because the purging really happened on no votes will come from ACORN's registration efforts, but that doesn't matter.
If there is a shortage of volunteers willing to register voters, that's news to me, especially when I see how many volunteers have been showing up this election season. But let's say my observations and the anecdotes I've heard are wrong. It would be worth fewer new registrations to not have doubt placed on all of them. But that's for the future. Right now, the perceived legitimacy of an Obama victory might rest on pushing back successfully against this anti-ACORN campaign Republicans are on. All those things I admit I realize aren't generally realized. Over in the quotes column, I quoted a great comeback Rep. Maxine Waters had to Wall Street Journal editorial page hack Stephen Moore when he repeated the talking points and had to ask her what the ACORN acronym stood for. Without missing a beat, she said, "Well, if you don't know what it stands for, you shouldn't be talking about it." Some smarty will presumably learn what it stands for, but most won't (I can't remember off the top of my head either, but I'm not accusing them of committing fraud). A video blogger somewhere (sorry, I forget where I saw this) asked people in line for a McCain rally when they first heard of ACORN, and the general answer was "yesterday". So the means exist to show attackers don't know what they're talking about.
That's the present. For the future, let's do some political jiu-jitsu. Get them to support the idea of registration reform. Point out that Canadians avoid this whole registration problem by using tax records. I doubt many conservatives will go for it, since the whole point of voter registration is to make voting harder, not to have honest elections, but maybe some moderates, and hopefully all liberals, will think that's a fine idea. Let's be ambitious, and make it part of overall election reform which we badly need. Between exact match laws, caging lists, provisional ballots, touchscreen voting, and all the other tricks Republican use, we need a lot of reform, and it will take a big Democratic, and enlightened, majority to achieve it.
Better Jew Than You 2
October 14
This reminds some Minnesotans of the "better Jew than you" letter. This was late in the 1990 race between incumbent Republican Rudy Boschwitz and Democrat Paul Wellstone. Both were Jewish, and Boschwitz's campaign sent a letter to Minnesota Jews pointing out that Wellstone married outside the faith. A lot of Jews were offended, especially those who had married Gentiles. The race was neck and neck and Wellstone pulled it out, so there's a theory that the letter cost Boschwitz the race. This was the first thing many of us thought of when Erik Paulsen's surrogates held their "better suburbanite than you" press conference. They were asked by reporters if they were making a racial reference. I suspect they hope voters will suspect the childless bachelor must be gay. For sure, they appear not to know that renters do pay property taxes and Madia probably isn't the only renter in the district. Nor I'm guessing is he the only bachelor or childless adult, all of whom have been told they have less value than people like Paulsen and the surrogates who held the press conference, since Paulsen didn't have the guts to do it himself.
I predict Madia wins, and this will be where Paulsen blew it.




