a raven attacking an eagle The Raven's Blog. May the better bird win.
Google


WWW The Raven's Blog

A couple voting stories with little attention
September 8

There are couple voting rights and elections related stories recently that haven't gotten much attention. One is about the flouting of the law genreally known as the "moter-voter" law, which required some government agencies, drivers license bureaus being the best known, to offer voter registration to people seeking their services. The requirement also includes social service agenices. According to Stephen Rosenfeld in Alternet, most states are ignoring this part ofthe law. How many people might be registered this way?

"Another indication of how many poor people could register is Tennessee, whose elections are federally supervised. From 2005-2006, Tennessee registered 120,992 people at public assistance offices -- nearly a quarter of the national total, the EAC reported. Tennessee registered more voters than the combined totals of welfare office registrations from California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Washington."
Tennessee is just a medium-sized state. Perhaps millions of people might be registered if the law was observed. Why isn't it? Easy: these are the poor we're talking about, the economic group least likekly to vote, and not coincidentally least likey to have thier interests considered, which I suggest are two mutually reinforcing facts. If they did start voting, a lot of election results could change. Of course, if those who do vote could be removed frmo the registration rolls, that could change election results too (Did I say "could"? Don't forget Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004, where they poor were far more likely to find they had been purged when they showed up at the polls). That explains why the DOJ has been working to make states purge their voter rolls.

The other hidden but potentially big story is the initiative in California to award Electoral College votes by congressional district instead of one package. The initiave is coming from an astroturf (fake grassroots) group made up just for the occasion called Californians for Equal Representation, which is really a GOP front group. The effect of the initiative would be to greak off a bunch of California's votes for the GOP. Funny thing --- they aren't trying this in any other state, like a state where the GOP runs the state government and could pass it. It might sound fair, as it did when I first heard the idea suggested after the 2000 election gave us the current acting president even though he lost the election. Awarding votes by district would appear to break up the unfairness of the winner take all system, and get a little closer to actually representing the popular will, even if it's still a far cry from a direct popular vote --- you know, the way almost every other democracy elects its presidents. This is in fact how votes are apportioned in Maine and Nebraska, where there a vote for each district, and the two votes the states get for their senators are awarded by the statewide vote. However, these are small states and they've never split their votes. The initiative in California is intended to break up a big Democratic block of votes.

You might if you want argue for the general fairness of the concept, and since the states decide how their votes are awarded, California could do this as well as anyone else. The problem with the concept, which I didn't know back in 2000 when I thought it sounded fairer, is how badly congressional districts are gerrymandered. If you think the current system makes most votes meaningless since most of us don't live in a swing state, wait until the election is decided not by 10 or 15 states, but by maybe 35 districts. Not even a tenth of all voters will really have anything to say about who gets elected. Even in big California, only a few districts will be competitive. If you think the barrage of ads in swing states is bad now, imagine living in one of those 35 districts.

Even if you still like the concept, consider that doing this just in California amounts to unilateral disarmament for the Democrats. At least doing it nationally would affect both sides. Asking Democrats to go along with it on principle is like saying that because we don't like political TV ads, the Democrats should stop, even though the Republicans will still be using them.

The best hope for defeating this initiative is that California voters might have caught on to problems with elections as indicated by the tests run by Secretary of State Debra Bowen which showed the touchscreen machines failed. She required manual recounts, and banned links to outside computers. Then again, this increased awareness might be what the initiative backers are hoping to exploit. I hope Californians will take a close look at it.

Getting back to Ohio, taking a close look should have preserved the 2004 ballots from destruction, since in response to lawsuits from groups still seeking access to the ballots to investigate the fraudulent election, a federal judge ordered the ballots preserved. Lo and behold, when the Democratic secretary of state took office this year, she discovered most counties had violated the court order and destroyed many or all ballots. Once we cut through the "dog ate my homework" excuses, what becomes clear is that much of the evidence of election fraud has been destroyed.

"You don't care about me."
16 year old Guantanamo detainee Omar Khadr, when he realized the Canadian agent he thought had come to take him out of Hell and home to Canada was just another interrogator.

"Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation whenever he shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him to do so whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such purpose, and you allow him to make war at his pleasure. Study to see if you can fix any limit to his power in this respect, after having given him so much as you propose."
Abraham Lincoln in 1848, during the Mexican War, expressing why allowing a president sole discretion to decide when to invade another country is dangerous to the liberty of his own country.

"The OPR [the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility]also has been far behind in producing required annual public reports summarizing its activities. Last month, it released its report covering fiscal year 2005. That means many investigations undertaken during the tenure of former Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales remain under wraps."
LA Times reporter Richard B. Schmit, in an article written in July 2008, on how the OPR is hiding the results of investigations --- assuming they actually are investigating.

"Mr. Chairman, I think the number's actually higher than that now. Last time I checked it was 108, and the total number that were declared homicides by the military services, or by the CIA, or others doing investigations, CID, and so forth — was 25, 26, 27."
Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell's former chief of staff, on the number of detainees killed in Bush's prisons in Iraq, Afghanistan, and locations still secret.

"Democracy works, but sometimes churns slowly. Time is short. The 2008 election is critical for the planet. If Americans turn out to pasture the most brontosaurian congressmen, if Washington adapts to address climate change, our children and grandchildren can still hold great expectations."
James Hansen, on the 20th anniversary of his testimony before Congress where he informed them global warming was now certain, and how little time remains to prevent catastrophes.

"Who will chair the commission investigating the secrets of warrantless spying, years from today? Will it be a young senator in this body today? Will it be someone not yet elected? What will that senator say when he or she comes to our actions, reads in the records how we let outrage after outrage after outrage slide, with nothing more than a promise to stop the next one? I imagine that senator will ask of us, 'Why didn't they do anything? Why didn't they fight back? In June 2008, when no one could doubt anymore what the administration was doing---why did they sit on their hands?'"
Sen. Chris Dodd, in his speech on the Senate floor opposing the FISA bill and retroactive immunity.

"We had the worst natural disaster in the history of this country Katrina, and there wasn't a drop of oil spilled."
Sen. Norm Coleman, proposing more offshore oil drilling. There was actually enough oil spilled to match the Exxon Valdez. Whether Coleman is lying, or ignorantly repeating Republican talking points, is unknown.

"I'll go back to square one on this: We squandered a lot of gifts. Human beings were given a lot of great gifts. We were given the ability to reason, this extra-large brain, walking erect, having binocular vision and the opposable thumb, and all of these things, and we had such promise, but we squandered it on goods and superstition. We gave ourselves over to the high priests and the traders, and they are the ones we allow to control us."
George Carlin, in an interview with Salon, on how he became a disappointed idealist.

"To date, seven long years after we scooped up our first detainees in Afghanistan, not a single one of them has faced evidence, his accusers, or anything remotely resembling a legal court hearing on his guilt or innocence."
Joseph Galloway, military correspondent for McClatchy, on how responsibility for war crimes goes right to the top, despite efforts to confine consequences to the bottom, in light of the recent McClatchy series on detainees.

"As I was leaving the UN food distribution center in Damascus, Layla Atiya, the widow with seven children, touched my arm. 'Can you tell me one thing?,' she pleaded. 'Why did America do this to us? What did we do to America to make her hate us so?'"
Medea Benjamin, cofounder of Code Pink, writing about her visit to Iraqi refugee camps.

"So we're sitting here and, for example, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, who said that he wanted to be a martyr on 9/11, make no mistake about it --- he said that he just couldn't get a visa --- launched into a description of what kind of psychotropic drugs he's taking here at the prison camp, or being given here at the prison camp. And the media monitors hit the white noise button. We didn't get to hear what exactly he's being given and we didn't exactly hear his explanation about why he's on medication.

And one of the escorts here explained that this was HIPAA protection, the Health and Information Protection Act on a place where the Bush Administration says the Constitution doesn't apply."
Miami Herald reporter Carol Rosenberg, on the restrictions placed on the press and mistreatment of detainees.

"If the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court was really concerned about fairness, it could have simply asked the Florida Supreme Court to devise a universal standard, appoint a judge to enforce it, and then extend the state's meaningless 'safe harbor' deadline to make it possible to complete the recount. It did not do so because it was not interested in counting the votes. It wanted George W. Bush to win."
Gary Kamiya, Salon writer at large, in a review of the HBO's "Recount", on how the Supreme Court stole the election for Bush.

"Convicting and imprisoning Paul Minor on corruption charges could be a powerful way to curtail contributions to the local Democratic Party."
U.S. House Judiciary Committee report on political prosecutions by the Bush DOJ. Minor was a vital contributor to the Mississippi Democratic Party.

"Where does the madness end? Where do words lose their meaning? Al-Qa'ida is not being defeated. Hizbollah has just won a domestic war in Lebanon, as total as Hamas's war in Gaza. Afghanistan and Iraq and Lebanon and Gaza are hell disasters — I need no apology to quote Churchill's description of 1948 Palestine yet again — and this foolish, stupid, vicious man is lying to the world yet again."
Robert Fisk, columnist and resident of Lebanon, responding to remarks by Bush that show he hasn't the least understanding of the region he's mucking up.

"The short version: Republicans in Congress, McCain included, have slashed the United States budget for wind energy since Carter was president, which is why McCain has to speak at a Danish turbine manufacturer instead of an American one."
Mother Jones reporter/blogger Jonathan Stein, noting that McCain made his climate change speech in a Danish wind turbine factory after repeatedly cutting funding for wind development here.

"We get off on warfare."
Rev. Rod Parsley, McCain's spiritual advisor, who calls for mass murder, in a snippet of a sermon in a video by Mother Jones and Brave New Films. That line of Christian charity comes about 1:25 into the video.



Home       About       Contact       Archives       Quotes       A Strand of the Celtic Fringe       Sparkyferguson.net

This letter has been read by the acting president and approved as within his definition of national security.